Table 2 Comparison of mean 95% utilization distribution overlap index (UDOI) values by dyad type and study regions (Callao and Lima Sur)
Dyad Type | N Dyads | No Overlap, n (%) | Overlap, n (%) | All Dyads 95% UDOI, mean (sd) | Overlapping Dyads Only 95% UDOI, mean (sd) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Both Regions | |||||
Both Cases | 595 | 385 (64.7) | 210 (35.3) | 0.06 (0.22) | 0.17 (0.34) |
Both Controls | 2016 | 1089 (54.0) | 927 (46.0) | 0.14 (0.36) | 0.31 (0.47) |
Case-Control | 2240 | 1311 (58.5) | 929 (41.5) | 0.06 (0.19) | 0.13 (0.28) |
Clustered | 15 | 8 (53.3) | 7 (46.7) | 0.29 (0.55) | 0.63 (0.67) |
Not Clustered | 580 | 377 (65.0) | 203 (35.0) | 0.05 (0.20) | 0.15 (0.31) |
Callao Only | |||||
Both Cases | 120 | 68 (56.7) | 52 (43.33) | 0.12 (0.33) | 0.29 (0.45) |
Both Controls | 496 | 126 (25.4) | 370 (74.6) | 0.29 (0.43) | 0.39 (0.46) |
Case-Control | 512 | 232 (45.3) | 280 (54.69) | 0.09 (0.23) | 0.16 (0.29) |
Clustered | 4 | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50) | 0.63 (0.81) | 1.26 (0.63) |
Not Clustered | 116 | 66 (56.9) | 50 (43.1) | 0.11 (0.29) | 0.25 (0.40) |
Lima Sur Only | |||||
Both Cases | 171 | 36 (21.1) | 135 (78.9) | 0.12 (0.27) | 0.15 (0.30) |
Both Controls | 496 | 34 (6.9) | 462 (93.2) | 0.3 (0.49) | 0.32 (0.50) |
Case-Control | 608 | 79 (13.0) | 529 (87.0) | 0.13 (0.28) | 0.14 (0.30) |
Clustered | 7 | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | 0.27 (0.48) | 0.38 (0.55) |
Not Clustered | 164 | 34 (20.7) | 130 (79.3) | 0.11 (0.26) | 0.14 (0.29) |