Skip to main content

Table 1 The number (%) of studies reported clinical diagnosis concerning bacterial pathogen

From: Antibiotic resistance in Pakistan: a systematic review of past decade

Pathogen

N studies

UTI N(%)

EF N (%)

WI N (%)

RTI N (%)

BSI N (%)

DTI N (%)

MI N(%)

NM N (%)

Acinetobacter spp

15

–

–

1(6.67%)

2(13.3%)

–

–

3(20%)

9(60%)

E. coli

28

13(46.4%)

–

3(10.71%)

–

2(7.14%)

2*(7.1%)

–

8(28.5%)

Enterococcus spp

4

2(50%)

–

–

–

–

–

–

2(50%)

H. pylori

3

–

–

–

–

–

3(100%)

–

–

Haemophilus spp

1

–

–

–

1(100%)

–

–

–

–

Klebsiella spp

13

3(23.1%)

–

2(15.3%)

–

1(7.69%)

–

2(15.38%)

5(38.4%)

N. gonorrhea.

2

1(50%)

–

–

–

–

–

–

1(50%)

Proteus spp

2

–

–

1(50%)

–

1(50%)

–

–

–

Pseudomonas spp

13

1(7.7%)

–

2(15.3)%

1(7.69%)

1(7.69%)

–

2(15.38%)

6(46.1%)

S. aureus

20

–

–

5(25%)

–

1(5%)

–

4(20%)

10(50%)

Salmonella spp

10

–

10(100%)

–

–

–

–

–

–

Shigella spp

4

–

–

–

–

–

2(50%)

1(25%)

1(25%)

Streptococcus spp

2

–

–

–

2(100%)

–

–

–

–

  1. N Number, UTI Urinary Tract Infection, EF Enteric Fever, WI Wound Infection, RTI Respiratory Tract Infection, BSI Blood Stream Infection, DTI Digestive Tract Infection, MIS Multiple Infection, NM Not Mentioned the infection type. * The two studies demonstrate E. coli as a causative agent of digestive tract infection, in which one is EPEC [31], and second is EAEC [38]