Skip to main content

Table 3 Acceptability of HIVST among an RDS sample of MSM. stratified by the report of prior HIV testing in 12 Brazilian cities. 2016

From: Acceptability of HIV self-testing is low among men who have sex with men who have not tested for HIV: a study with respondent-driven sampling in Brazil

Variables

No previous HIV test

Previous negative HIV result

 

Bivariate

Multivariate

Bivariate

Multivariate

 

Wt%a

Unadj ORb

p-value

AdjORc

p-value

Wt%a

Unadj ORb

p-value

AdjORc

p-value

Age

 ≥ 25 years

34.2

1.00

0.07

  

48.3

1.00

0.53

  

 < 25 years

48.3

1.79 (0.93–3.45)

 

51.4

1.13 (0.76–1.66)

 

Race

 Black

34.6

1.00

0.30

  

49.9

1.00

0.09

  

 Brown/mixed race

44.5

1.51 (0.83–2.74)

 

44.0

0.78 (0.45–1.36)

 

 White

48.6

1.79 (0.86–3.70)

 

57.4

1.35 (0.76–2.40)

 

Schooling

  

0.01

    

< 0.001

  

 Primary/Incomplete secondary education

35.5

1.00

 

1.00

 

30.1

1.00

 

1.00

 

 Complete secondary/Incomplete undergraduate education

53.1

2.05 (1.16–3.64)

 

1.74 (1.01–3.01)

0.04

53.7

2.69 (1.70–4.26)

 

2.17 (1.34–3.51)

< 0.001

 Complete undergraduate education

20.4

0.46 (0.11–1.93)

 

0.86 (0.27–2.76)

0.81

67.4

4.80 (2.58–8.92)

 

3.39 (1.75–6.56)

< 0.001

Socio-economic status groups

 D-E (Low)

32.5

1.00

0.07

  

27.0

1.00

< 0.001

  

 C (Middle)

40.6

1.41 (0.67–2.96)

 

48.5

2.54 (1.47–4.36)

 

 A-B (High)

52.6

2.30 (1.08–4.89)

 

56.1

3.45 (2.02–5.88)

 

Marital status

 Married/living together

43.7

1.00

0.91

55.2

1.00

0.33

 Single/separated/widowed

42.6

0.95 (0.42–2.16)

 

49.2

0.78 (0.47–1.28)

 

Self-report of discrimination during the lifetime

 No

29.3

1.00

< 0.001

1.00

 

38.8

1.00

0.001

 Yes

54.4

2.87 (1.69–4.87)

 

2.00 (1.18–3.38)

0.01

54.6

1.89 (1.27–2.82)

 

Medical appointment in the last 12 months

 No

33.6

1.00

0.01

1.00

 

48.6

1.00

0.75

  

 Yes

49.9

1.96 (1.12–3.40)

 

1.74 (1.01–2.99)

0.04

50.7

1.08 (0.64–1.82)

 

Took part of any workshop on STI and HIV/AIDS in the last 12 months

 No

39.1

1.00

0.03

  

53.1

1.00

0.03

  

 Yes

58.3

2.17 (1.03–4.57)

 

41.2

0.61 (0.39–0.96)

 

Knowledge about HIV/AIDS (IRT score)d

 Low

38.3

1.00

0.06

1.00

 

31.7

1.00

< 0.001

1

 

 Middle

39.8

1.06 (0.57–1.98)

 

1.13 (0.66–1.96)

0.64

52.6

2.39 (1.37–4.14)

 

2.38 (1.44–3.92)

< 0.001

 High

59.9

2.41 (1.08–5.37)

 

2.45 (1.05–5.70)

0.04

61.2

3.39 (1.85–6.24)

 

2.79 (1.58–4.93)

< 0.001

Self-perception of risk

 Low

38.0

1.00

0.67

  

37.3

1.00

0.11

  

 Middle

45.9

1.38 (0.72–2.62)

 

51.7

1.79 (0.95–3.37)

 

 High

42.6

1.21 (0.40–3.64)

 

56.4

2.17 (0.91–5.15)

 

Took part of LGBT NGO

 No

39.5

1.00

0.02

1.00

 

46.6

1.00

< 0.001

1.00

 

 Yes

65.0

2.84 (1.12–7.17)

 

3.26 (1.29–8.25)

0.01

64.1

2.04 (1.23–3.39)

 

2.06 (1.28–3.32)

0.003

Condomless receptive anal sex (past 6 months)

 Always used condoms

42.5

1.00

0.96

  

45.1

1.00

0.01

1.00

 

 Irregular use of condoms

42.8

1.01 (0.57–1.76)

 

56.5

1.58 (1.09–2.28)

 

1.46 (1.00–2.15)

0.049

  1. a Gile-SS weighted proportion of acceptability
  2. b Unadjusted weighted odds ratio of acceptability with 95% confidence limits
  3. c Adjusted weighted odds ratio of acceptability with 95% confidence limits
  4. d Score obtained through Item Response Theory Analysis