Skip to main content

Table 1 The table shows numbers of infected nonunion differentiated in type of infection (monomicrobial vs. polymicrobial) and cases in which germ-change occurred in course of surgical treatment. Those data are compared for different demographic data as well as fracture type (closed to open fractures). No significant difference was evidenced comparing infection types and germ change for demographic data and fracture type except previous revision surgery at a referral hospital

From: Polymicrobial infections and microbial patterns in infected nonunions – a descriptive analysis of 42 cases

 

infected nonunion

Infection Type

[n / %]

Mono [n / %]

Poly [n / %]

Germ Change [n / %]

Pearson χ2 Test [p-value]

patients

total number

42 / 100

21 / 50.0

6 / 14.3

15 / 35.7

gender

female

17 / 40.5

10 / 47.6

4 / 66.7

3 / 20.0

0.13

male

25 / 59.5

11 / 52.4

2 /33.3

12 / 80.0

fracture localization

humerus

2 / 4.8

1 / 4.8

0 / 0

1 /6.7

 

radius/ulna

3 / 7.1

0 / 0

0 / 0

3 / 20.0

 

femur

12 / 28.6

5 / 23.8

3 / 50.0

4 / 26.7

0.24

tibia/fibula

25 / 59.5

15 / 71.4

3 / 50.0

7 / 46.7

 

ASA score

1

2 / 4.8

0 / 0

1/ 20.0

1 / 7.1

 

2

26 / 61.9

12 / 57.1

2 / 40.0

12 / 85.7

0.05

3

12 / 28.6

9 / 42.9

2 / 40.0

1 / 7.1

 

BMI [kg/m2]

< 18.5

   

0.51

18.5–25.0

16 / 39.0

8 / 38.1

3 / 60.0

5 / 33.3

25.0–30.0

7 / 17.1

2 / 9.5

1 /20.0

4 / 26.7

> 30.0

18 / 43.9

11 / 52.4

1 / 20.0

6 / 43.9

fracture

closed

24 / 57.1

11 / 52.4

3 / 50.0

10 /66.7

0.69

open

18 / 42.9

10 / 47.6

3 / 50.0

5 / 33.3

revision surgery at referral hospital

yes

26 / 61.9

16 / 76.2

5 / 83.3

5 / 33.3%

0.01

no

16 / 38.1

5 / 23.8

1 / 16.7

10 / 66.7%