Table 5 Condomless receptive anal sex vs. HIV perceived risk among MSM from 11 cities in Brazil
| Â | Condomless receptive anal sexa | HIV perceived risk b | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | High | |||
North | ||||
 Manaus | No | 133(79.6) | 34(20.4) | <.001 |
Yes | 60(56.6) | 46(43.4) | Â | |
 Belém | No | 137(85.6) | 23(14.4) | <.001 |
Yes | 71(64.0) | 40(36.0) | Â | |
Northeast | ||||
 Recife | No | 295(82.4) | 63(17.6) | <.001 |
Yes | 153(64.3) | 85(35.7) | Â | |
 Salvador | No | 292(81.3) | 67(18.7) | <.001 |
Yes | 138(60.8) | 89(39.2) | Â | |
Central-west | ||||
 BrasÃlia | No | 400(79.4) | 104(20.6) | <.001 |
Yes | 212(62.9) | 125(37.1) | Â | |
 Goiânia | No | 247(77.9) | 70(22.1) | <.001 |
Yes | 123(59.1) | 85(40.9) | Â | |
Southeast | ||||
 São Paulo | No | 2592(81.5) | 590(18.5) | <.001 |
Yes | 1334(60.0) | 889(40.0) | Â | |
 Rio de Janeiro | No | 1397(81.6) | 314(18.4) | <.001 |
Yes | 741(60.0) | 494(40.0) | Â | |
 Belo Horizonte | No | 414(76.4) | 128(23.6) | <.001 |
Yes | 218(58.6) | 154(41.4) | Â | |
South | ||||
 Porto Alegre | No | 290(81.5) | 66(18.5) | <.001 |
Yes | 160(63.2) | 93(36.8) | Â | |
 Curitiba | No | 221(76.5) | 68(23.5) | <.001 |
Yes | 103(56.3) | 80(43.7) | Â | |
Brazil | No | 7400 (80.3) | 1811 (19.7) | <.001 |
Yes | 3847 (60.1) | 2552 (39.9) | Â | |