Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Differential expression and predictive value of monocyte scavenger receptor CD163 in populations with different tuberculosis infection statuses

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 May 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
21 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Qianqian Liu
Resubmission - Version 2
21 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kiarash Ghazvini
14 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Habip Gedik
11 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
18 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Qianqian Liu
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - Qianqian Liu
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Sep 2019 Author responded Author comments - Qianqian Liu
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Sep 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
30 Sep 2019 Editorially accepted
28 Nov 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12879-019-4525-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement