Skip to main content

Table 4 Poisson Regression Models for CAI with Non-Transactional Partners of MSM, Stratified by the Location Where Sex Occurred; NĀ =ā€‰1341

From: Contextualizing condoms: a cross-sectional study mapping intersections of locations of sexual contact, partner type, and substance use as contexts for sexual risk behavior among MSM in Peru

Ā 

Home (nĀ =ā€‰722)

Hotel (nĀ =ā€‰424)

Sauna/Internet Cabin (nĀ =ā€‰85)

Public Space (nĀ =ā€‰42)

Characteristic

PR

aPR

95% CI

PR

aPR

95% CI

PR

aPR

95% CI

PR

aPR

95% CI

Age

1.00

ā€“

ā€“

1.00

ā€“

ā€“

0.98

0.98

0.96ā€“1.01

1.01

ā€“

ā€“

Education (<Secondary is the reference category)

ā€ƒSecondary

0.97

ā€“

ā€“

1.19

ā€“

ā€“

0.56

0.49

0.33ā€“0.72

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

ā€ƒā€‰>ā€‰Secondary

1.06

ā€“

ā€“

1.24

ā€“

ā€“

0.60

0.58

0.42ā€“0.81

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

Participant sexual orientation (Homosexual is the reference category)

ā€ƒHetero/bisexual

0.76

0.78

0.61ā€“1.01

0.86

ā€“

ā€“

0.85

ā€“

ā€“

0.51

0.89

0.21ā€“3.84

Partner type (Stable is the reference category)

ā€ƒCasual

0.89

0.90

0.76ā€“1.07

1.16

ā€“

ā€“

0.81

ā€“

ā€“

0.54

ā€“

ā€“

ā€ƒAnonymous

0.94

0.95

0.76ā€“1.20

1.05

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

Participant alcohol use before/during sexa

ā€ƒYes ā€“ Not intoxicated

1.19

1.04

0.81ā€“1.32

1.24

1.25

0.83ā€“1.89

0.84

0.52

0.25ā€“1.09

1.52

ā€“

ā€“

ā€ƒIntoxicated

1.35

1.14

0.81ā€“1.62

1.51

1.57

1.02ā€“2.43

1.60

0.45

0.20ā€“1.02

1.46

ā€“

ā€“

Partner alcohol use before/during sex

ā€ƒYes ā€“ Not intoxicated

1.26

1.17

0.91ā€“1.52

1.24

0.97

0.64ā€“1.46

0.96

1.70

1.09ā€“2.67

2.66

2.65

1.41ā€“4.98

ā€ƒIntoxicated

1.29

1.14

0.79ā€“1.66

1.30

0.84

0.48ā€“1.47

1.67

3.97

1.83ā€“8.64

1.45

0.68

0.14ā€“3.30

Participant drug use before sex

ā€ƒMarijuana

1.32

1.36

1.01ā€“1.82

1.26

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

ā€“

1.24

ā€“

ā€“

ā€ƒCocaine

0.87

ā€“

ā€“

1.68

1.34

0.82ā€“2.17

0.87

ā€“

ā€“

1.12

ā€“

ā€“

Partner drug use before sex

ā€ƒMarijuana

1.04

ā€“

ā€“

1.10

ā€“

ā€“

1.09

ā€“

ā€“

1.64

1.31

0.72ā€“2.39

ā€ƒCocaine

0.83

ā€“

ā€“

1.48

1.10

0.65ā€“1.84

0.92

ā€“

ā€“

1.33

ā€“

ā€“

Knowledge of partner serostatus

ā€ƒYes

1.13

ā€“

ā€“

1.11

ā€“

ā€“

0.65

ā€“

ā€“

1.70

3.56

0.62ā€“20.59

Condom conversation before/during sex

ā€ƒYes

1.15

1.13

0.93ā€“1.37

1.28

1.32

1.02ā€“1.71

1.22

ā€“

ā€“

1.40

1.08

0.28ā€“4.24

  1. CAI condomless anal intercourse
  2. Bold textĀ =Ā p-value <ā€‰0.05. Adjusted models include all variables with crude p-value <ā€‰0.20
  3. aNo is the reference value forĀ all variables except Education, Participant sexual orientation, andĀ Partner type