Skip to main content

Table 2 Estimated odds ratio, standard error, 95% confidence interval, and P-values for effects of spatial scale and publication year on tick-borne disease risk. There were significant effects of scale and year (Wald test statistic [df = 4] = 117.6, P < 0.0001)

From: Systematic review and meta-analysis of tick-borne disease risk factors in residential yards, neighborhoods, and beyond

Spatial scaleOdds ratioSECIPNumber of studiesNumber of records
Yard2.601.16[1.96, 3.46]<0.00011359
Neighborhood4.081.29[2.49, 6.68]<0.000145
Outside Neighborhood2.031.13[1.59, 2.59]<0.0001934
Year0.971.01[0.96, 0.99]0.0001NANA