Skip to main content

Table 2 Uni and multivariable linear regression analysis of patient’s characteristics, years of exposure to antiretrovirals and trunk/limb fat mass ratio in 166 pts. with DEXA scan results

From: Association between lipodystrophy and length of exposure to ARTs in adult HIV-1 infected patients in Montreal

Risk factors

Univariablea regression coefficient [95% CI]

p-value

Multivariableb regression coefficient [95% CI]

p- Value

Characteristics of individual and HIV infection

 Age (per 10 years increase of age)

0.24 [0.08;0.41]

0.003

 Sex (female compared to male)

−0.78 [−1.13; − 0.43]

< 0.001

−0.83 [−1.15; − 0.51]

< 0.001

 Years since HIV infection (per 10 years of infection duration)

0.34 [0.13;0.55]

0.002

 Nadir CD4 (per 100 cells)

0.02 [− 0.04;0.08]

0.46

Immune parameters at time of dexa scan

 CD4 at DEXA (per 100 cells)

0.01 [−0.05;0.08]

0.70

 logViral load at DEXA test (per 1 log increase)

−0.7 [− 0.13; − 0.01]

0.015

−0.05 [− 0.11;0.00]

0.058

Exposure to antiretrovirals (measured in years of exposure, coefficients for 10 years increase in cumulative use)

 Zidovudine

0.26 [−0.05;0.57]

0.10

0.34 [0.06;0.62]

0.018

 Stavudine

1.0 [0.41;1.59]

0.001

0.92 [0.38;1.47]

0.001

 Abacavir

0.00 [−0.41;0.41]

1.0

 Tenofovir

−0.05 [− 0.44;0.33]

0.78

 Lopinavir/r

− 0.20 [− 0.61;0.20]

0.33

 Atazanavir/ r

0.11 [− 0.30;0.53]

0.59

 Draunavir/r

0.31 [− 0.27;0.90]

0.30

 Ritonavir

0.64 [0.12;1.17]

0.017

 Raltegravir

0.71 [0.19;1.22]

0.008

0.57 [0.10;1.05]

0.019

  1. DEXA Dual Energy Xray Absorbimetry; HIV human immunodeficiency virus; /r ritonavir
  2. aUnivariable models are models with only the listed variable as independent variable, and trunk/limb fat mass ratio as the dependant variable
  3. bFor the multivariable model, explanatory variables were entered in the multivariable model if they showed an association (indicated by p ≤ 0.10) with and trunk/limb fat mass ratio in the univariable model, and kept into the final model if they were independently associated with and trunk/limb fat mass ratio or if they modified the point estimate for other predictors by more than 10%
  4. For all coefficients showed in this table, the null value (showing no association) is 0