Skip to main content

Table 3 Antimicrobial resistance to commonly used topical agents among bacterial isolates from patients with ophthalmic infections, London, 2009ā€“2015. #One isolate was ā€˜intermediateā€™. Fusidic acid resistance increased significantly from secondary to tertiary care (pā€‰<ā€‰0.01). Chloramphenicol resistance increased significantly from primary to tertiary care (pā€‰<ā€‰0.01). ^ including Pseudomonas spp., Chryseobacterium spp. ~ including Pseudomonas spp. * including enterococci and all Gram-negative pathogens (except Neisseria spp. and Moraxella spp.) [14, 15]

From: Antibacterial resistance in ophthalmic infections: a multi-centre analysis across UK care settings

Antimicrobial

Descriptor

Care setting

Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

Chloramphenicol

Intrinsically-resistant isolates^ (n)

5.6% (82)

7.8% (58)

27.2% (127)

Non-intrinsically resistant isolates undergoing susceptibility testing (n)

94.0% (1301)

91.7% (632)

71.2% (242)

Non-intrinsically resistant isolates found to be resistant (n)

7.0% (91)

8.7% (55)

12.8% (31)

Overall antimicrobial resistance

11.8%

15.1%

33.8%

Moxifloxacin

Intrinsically-resistant isolates~ (n)

5.5% (81)

7.6% (57)

25.5% (118)

Non-intrinsically resistant isolates undergoing susceptibility testing (n)

12.5% (173)

7.2% (50)

10.9% (38)

Non-intrinsically resistant isolates found to be resistant (n)

0% (0)

0% (0)

0% (0#)

Overall percentage resistance

5.5%

7.6%

25.5%

Fusidic acid

Intrinsically-resistant isolates* (n)

46.9% (688)

49.7% (371)

50.3% (235)

Non-intrinsically resistant isolates undergoing susceptibility testing (n)

55.1% (429)

66.2% (249)

72.0% (167)

Non-intrinsically resistant isolates found to be resistant (n)

8.9% (38)

11.2% (28)

23.4% (39)

Overall percentage resistance

49.6%

53.4%

58.7%