Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Pleural fluid secondary to pulmonary cryptococcal infection: a case report and review of the literature

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Apr 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
24 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Yuan Zhang
Resubmission - Version 2
24 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Afia Zafar
21 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sahajal Dhooria
31 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rafal Krenke
6 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Yuan Zhang
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Yuan Zhang
Resubmission - Version 4
6 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sahajal Dhooria
27 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rafal Krenke
3 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Yuan Zhang
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Yuan Zhang
Resubmission - Version 6
25 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
29 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Yuan Zhang
Resubmission - Version 7
29 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
31 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
12 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12879-019-4343-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement