Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of different models of inheritance for the 7 selected SNPs

From: Genetic variants in Forkhead box O1 associated with predisposition to sepsis in a Chinese Han population

SNP

Model

Genotype

Normal controls

Sepsis patients

p value

p# value

Survivors (n = 85)

Nonsurvivors (n = 71)

p value

P# value

rs1126772

Codominant

A/A

85 (57.05%)

90 (57.69%)

0.999

0.999

47 (55.29%)

44 (61.97%)

0.654

0.658

A/G

49 (32.88%)

52 (33.33%)

  

31 (36.47%)

21 (29.58%)

  

G/G

12 (8.05%)

13 (8.33%)

  

7 (8.24%)

6 (8.45%)

  

Dominant

A/A

85 (57.05%)

90 (57.69%)

0.978

0.978

47 (55.29%)

44 (61.97%)

0.4

0.45

A/G-G/G

61 (42.95%)

65 (42.31%)

  

38 (44.71%)

27 (38.03%)

  

Recessive

A/A-A/G

134 (91.95%)

142 (91.67%)

0.958

0.968

7 (8.24%)

6 (8.45%)

0.961

0.963

G/G

12 (8.05%)

13 (8.33%)

  

78 (91.76%)

65 (91.55%)

  

Overdominant

A/A-G/G

97 (67.12%)

103 (66.03%)

0.998

0.999

54 (63.53%)

50 (70.42%)

0.363

0.363

A/G

49 (32.88%)

52 (33.33%)

  

31 (36.47%)

21 (29.58%)

  

rs2269715

Codominant

C/C

59 (39.6%)

58 (37.18%)

0.082

0.092

38 (44.71%)

20 (28.17%)

0.035

0.061

C/G

70 (46.98%)

79 (50.64%)

  

35 (41.18%)

44 (61.98%)

  

G/G

19 (12.75%)

8 (5.13%)

  

12 (14.12%)

7 (9.86%)

  

Dominant

C/C

59 (39.6%)

58 (37.18%)

0.981

0.980

38 (44.71%)

20 (28.17%)

0.033

0.053

C/G-G/G

89 (60.4%)

87 (55.77%)

  

47 (55.29%)

51 (71.83%)

  

Recessive

C/C-C/G

129 (87.25%)

137 (87.82%)

0.03

0.03

73 (85.88%)

64 (90.14%)

0.418

0.420

G/G

19 (12.75%)

8 (5.13%)

  

12 (14.12%)

7 (9.86%)

  

Overdominant

C/C-G/G

78 (52.35%)

66 (42.31%)

0.219

0.219

50 (58.83%)

27 (38.02%)

0.01

0.021

C/G

70 (46.98%)

79 (50.64%)

  

35 (41.18%)

44 (61.98%)

  

rs2721068

Codominant

T/T

7 (4.7%)

19 (12.18%)

0.03

0.03

12 (14.12%)

7 (9.86%)

0.665

0.667

T/C

58 (38.93%)

66 (42.31%)

  

34 (40.0%)

32 (45.07%)

  

C/C

84 (56.38%)

71 (45.51%)

  

39 (45.88%)

32 (45.07%)

  

Dominant

T/T

7 (4.7%)

19 (12.18%)

0.019

0.02

12 (14.12%)

7 (9.86%)

0.418

0.428

T/C-C/C

142 (95.3%)

137 (87.82%)

  

73 (85.88%)

64 (90.14%)

  

Recessive

T/T-T/C

65 (43.62%)

85 (54.49%)

0.058

0.058

46 (54.12%)

39 (54.93%)

0.919

0.920

C/C

84 (56.38%)

71 (45.51%)

  

39 (45.88%)

32 (45.07%)

  

Overdominant

T/T-C/C

92 (61.07%)

90 (57.69%)

0.517

0.520

51 (60.0%)

39 (54.93%)

0.523

0.525

T/C

58 (38.93%)

66 (42.31%)

  

34 (40.0%)

32 (45.07%)

  

rs17446614

Codominant

A/A

2 (1.34%)

3 (1.92%)

0.045

0.046

1 (1.18%)

2 (2.82%)

0.679

0.680

A/G

35 (23.49%)

20 (12.82%)

  

10 (11.76%)

10 (14.08%)

  

G/G

110 (73.83%)

133 (85.25%)

  

74 (87.06%)

59 (83.10%)

  

Dominant

A/A

2 (1.34%)

3 (1.92%)

0.701

0.701

1 (1.18%)

2 (2.82%)

0.458

0.460

A/G-G/G

145 (97.32%)

153 (98.08%)

  

84 (98.82%)

69 (97.18%)

  

Recessive

A/A-A/G

37 (24.84%)

23 (14.75%)

0.023

0.023

11 (12.94%)

12 (16.90%)

0.487

0.489

G/G

110 (73.83%)

133 (85.25%)

  

74 (87.06%)

59 (83.10%)

  

Overdominant

A/A-G/G

112 (75.17%)

136 (87.18%)

0.013

0.013

75 (88.24%)

61 (85.92%)

0.666

0.667

A/G

35 (23.49%)

20 (12.82%)

  

10 (11.76%)

10 (14.08%)

  

rs41317734

Codominant

C/C

121 (81.21%)

133 (85.25%)

0.585

0.589

73 (85.88%)

60 (84.51%)

0.6

0.63

C/T

26 (17.45%)

22 (14.10%)

  

11 (12.94%)

11 (15.49%)

  

T/T

2 (1.34%)

1 (0.64%)

  

1 (1.18%)

0 (0.00%)

  

Dominant

C/C

121 (81.21%)

133 (85.25%)

0.344

0.367

73 (85.88%)

60 (84.51%)

0.809

0.810

C/T-T/T

28 (18.79%)

23 (14.75%)

  

12 (14.12%)

11 (15.49%)

  

Recessive

C/C-C/T

147 (98.66%)

155 (99.36%)

0.535

0.535

84 (98.82%)

71 (100%)

0.359

0.360

T/T

2 (1.34%)

1 (0.64%)

  

1 (1.18%)

0 (0.00%)

  

Overdominant

C/C-T/T

123 (82.55%)

134 (85.90%)

0.422

0.435

74 (87.06%)

60 (84.51%)

0.648

0.659

C/T

26 (17.45%)

22 (14.10%)

  

11 (12.94%)

11 (15.49%)

  

rs62464631

Codominant

A/A

2 (1.34%)

1 (0.64%)

0.555

0.556

1 (1.18%)

0 (0.00%)

0.6

0.61

A/G

26 (17.45%)

22 (14.10%)

  

11 (12.94%)

11 (15.49%)

  

G/G

119 (79.87%)

133 (85.25%)

  

73 (85.88%)

60 (84.51%)

  

Dominant

A/A

2 (1.34%)

1 (0.64%)

0.527

0.528

1 (1.18%)

0 (0.00%)

0.359

0.359

A/G-G/G

145 (97.32%)

155 (99.36%)

  

84 (98.82%)

71 (100%)

  

Recessive

A/A-A/G

28 (18.79%)

23 (14.75%)

0.317

0.318

12 (14.12%)

11 (15.49%)

0.809

0.812

G/G

119 (79.87%)

133 (85.25%)

  

73 (85.88%)

60 (84.51%)

  

Overdominant

A/A-G/G

121 (81.21%)

134 (85.90%)

0.393

0.393

74 (87.06%)

60 (84.51%)

0.648

0.648

A/G

26 (17.45%)

22 (14.10%)

  

11 (12.94%)

11 (15.49%)

  

rs56952063

Codominant

C/C

10 (6.71%)

7 (4.49%)

0.419

0.420

3 (3.53%)

4 (5.63%)

0.676

0.678

C/T

54 (36.24%)

67 (42.95%)

  

35 (41.18%)

32 (45.07%)

  

T/T

84 (56.38%)

82 (43.10%)

  

47 (55.29%)

35 (49.30%)

  

Dominant

C/C

10 (6.71%)

7 (4.49%)

0.389

0.389

3 (3.53%)

4 (5.63%)

0.527

0.527

C/T-T/T

138 (92.62%)

149 (95.51%)

  

82 (96.47%)

67 (94.37%)

  

Recessive

C/C-C/T

64 (42.96%)

74 (56.90%)

0.463

0.470

38 (44.71%)

36 (50.70%)

0.455

0.456

T/T

84 (56.38%)

82 (43.10%)

  

47 (55.29%)

35 (49.30%)

  

Overdominant

C/C-T/T

94 (63.09%)

89 (57.05%)

0.25

0.26

50 (58.82%)

39 (54.93%)

0.625

0.626

C/T

54 (36.24%)

67 (42.95%)

  

35 (41.18%)

32 (45.07%)

  
  1. P value: Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact two-tailed tests; p# value: False discovery rate adjusted p value using the Benjamini-Hochberg method