Skip to main content

Table 3 Stratified analyses for the evaluation of heterogeneity in studies with real-time PCR assay

From: Diagnostic accuracy of in-house real-time PCR assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Subgroup (Number of studies)

Summary diagnostic odds ratio (95% CI)a

Chi2 square test of heterogeneity

P value for heterogeneityb

Study design

 Cross-sectional (10)

403.18 (120.05–1354.05)

36.66

< 0.001

 Case-control (8)

73.86 (20.40–267.48)

34.01

< 0.001

Target sequence

 IS6110 (11)

144.74 (51.24–408.86)

39.39

< 0.001

 Other target (7)

297.17 (30.22–2921.73)

66.27

< 0.001

Specimen type

 Respiratory (11)

598.12 (269.12–1329.32)

19.09

0.039

 Non-respiratory (5)

12.39 (6.67–22.73)

3.57

0.468

 Both (2)

202.47 (64.68–633.83)

0.00

0.944

Region of study

 TB high-burden country (8)

281.86 (37.69–2107.75)

90.46

< 0.001

 Other country (10)

160.73 (72.80–354.83)

15.17

0.086

Quality of study

 High-quality (7)

926.97 (303.59–2830.38)

12.83

0.046

 Medium-quality (8)

76.77 (22.98–256.50)

26.65

< 0.001

 Low-quality (3)

72.35 (4.47–1170.04)

19.07

< 0.001

  1. aRandom effects model
  2. bchi-square or Fisher’s exact test for heterogeneity; high-quality study: a study that had no domain with a high risk of bias and no domain with high applicability concerns; medium/moderate-quality study: a study that had domain with a unclear risk of bias or domain with unclear applicability concerns; low-quality study: a study that had a domain with a high risk of bias and domain with high applicability concerns