Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Diagnosis of mycoplasma pneumoniae by loop-mediated isothermal amplification: systematic review and meta-analysis

Studies included

Country

Mycoplasma pneumonia patients

Control group

Mycoplasma pneumonia patients included in the staging

Detection method

Company of the reagent source

Gold standard

Blind

Value of the positive judgment

Results

FN

TP

FP

TN

Ryoichi Saito, 2005

Japan

6

89

No

LAMP

1.Roche Diagnostics

Real-time PCR

yes

2 × 10 2

6

0

89

0

2.Qiagen

3.Applied Biosystems

FEI ZHAO, 2013

China

21

59

No

LAMP

Qiagen

Real-time PCR

yes

unclear

21

5

54

0

Amy E. Ratliff II, 2014

American

22

192

No

LAMP

1.Qiagen

Real-time PCR

yes

C T ≤ 42.0

22

2

190

0

2.Agilent

Brianna L. Petrone, 2015

American

226

26

No

LAMP

1.Roche Applied Science

Real-time PCR

yes

CT < 30

200

1

25

26

2.Thermo Scientific

3.MP Biomedicals

Brianna L. Petrone, 2015

American

39

33

No

LAMP

1.Roche Applied Science

Real-time PCR

yes

CT ≥ 30

32

0

33

7

2.Thermo Scientific

3.MP Biomedicals

Fujio Kakuya, 2017

Japan

58

43

NO

LAMP

1.Eiken Chemical

Real-time PCR

Yes

an MP DNA load of> = 4.5 copies/μL

15

0

43

0

2.Asahi Kasei Pharma

Fujio Kakuya, 2017

Japan

58

50

NO

LAMP

1.Eiken Chemical

Real-time PCR

Yes

an MP DNA load of> = 4.5 copies/μL

8

0

43

7

2.Asahi Kasei Pharma

Ho Namkoong, 2018

Japan

73

84

No

LAMP

1. Mizuho Medy

Real-time PCR

yes

unclear

70

1

83

3

1. Fujifilm

2. Asahi Kasei Pharma

Xin Yuan, 2018

China

116

9

No

LAMP

1. Oxoid

Real-time PCR

yes

unclear

37

6

3

79

2. New England Biolabs

3. Da An Gene Co,

4. Sinopharm Chemical Reagents

5. Shanghai Simco Biotech

6. Beijing Mylab Corporation

  1. TP true positive, FP false positive, FN false negative, TN true negative