Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cost-effectiveness analysis of isavuconazole versus voriconazole for the treatment of patients with possible invasive aspergillosis in Sweden

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Apr 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Kong
17 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chin Fen Neoh
20 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maricela C. Valerio
25 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hongbo Yang
24 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Lefteris Floros
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chin Fen Neoh
20 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Lefteris Floros
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Lefteris Floros
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
11 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12879-019-3683-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement