Using clinical practice guidelines to manage dengue: a qualitative study in a Malaysian hospital
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Dec 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ajantha Liyanage|
|3 Apr 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ananda Wijewickrama|
|25 Apr 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Alexandra Wharton-Smith|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Apr 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ajantha Liyanage|
|24 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ananda Wijewickrama|
|9 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Akshay Dhariwal|
|4 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Alexandra Wharton-Smith|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ajantha Liyanage|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jan 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12879-019-3680-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.