Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of the association of animal level risk factors with prevalence of bovine tuberculin positivity

From: Bovine tuberculosis in eastern Ethiopia: prevalence, risk factors and its public health importance

Risk factor*

Categories

No. of animals

OR (95% CI)

P-value

Examined

Positive (%)

Site

Harar

224

25 (11.2)

Ref.

 

Dire Dawa

58

29 (50.0)

7.96 (4.107–15.427)

0.000

Jigjiga

33

10 (30.3)

3.46 (1.477–8.104)

0.004

Age

1–5 years

85

17 (20.0)

Ref.

 

6–9 years

172

42 (24.4)

1.29 (0.685–2.439)

0.429

> 9 years

58

5 (8.6)

0.37 (0.130–1.089)

0.072

BCS

Poor

67

15 (22.4)

Ref.

 

Medium

147

29 (19.7)

0.85 (0.421–1.721)

0.655

Good

101

20 (19.8)

0.85 (0.402–1.820)

0.686

Lactationa

Non-lactating

115

11 (9.5)

Ref.

 

Lactating

200

53 (26.5)

0.29 (0.146–0.588)

0.001

Pregnancya

Non pregnant

276

51 (18.5)

Ref.

 

Pregnant

39

13 (33.3)

2.22 (1.062–4.587)

0.034

Breedb

Local

63

11 (17.5)

Ref.

 

Cross breed

15

1 (6.7)

0.30 (0.032–2.794)

0.289

Exotic

237

52 (21.9)

0.71 (0.195–2.596)

0.607

Herd sizec

1–5

46

5 (10.9)

Ref.

 

6–10

48

4(8.3)

0.74 (0.187–2.968)

0.677

> 10

221

55(24.9)

2.71 (1.022–7.218)

0.045

Farming systemb,c

Extensive

51

7 (13.7)

Ref.

 

Intensive

229

50 (21.8)

3.69 (0.820–16.625)

0.089

Semi intensive

35

7 (20.0)

1.84 (0.418–8.120)

0.419

Management condition

Good

83

1 (1.2)

Ref.

 

Poor

63

14 (22.2)

3.66 (1.31–1.83)

0.000

Medium

169

49 (29.0)

1.51 (0.51–1.51)

 
  1. *Variables with similar superscripts are collinear