Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariate regression models indicating associations between variables and outcomes of interest

From: The adherence to guidelines for preventing CVC-related infections: a survey among Italian health-care workers

Variable

OR

SE

95% CI

P value

Model 1: Knowledge about CDC main recommendations for preventing CVC-related CLABSIs

 Log likelihood = 133.20; χ2 = 54.62 (5 df); p < 0001

  Availability of internal protocols about CVC management

3.79

1.36

1.88–7.65

< .001

  Use of CDC guidelines as source of information

2.96

0.99

1.54–5.69

.001

  Number of years of practice

1.04

0.02

1.01–1.07

.03

  Professional role (nurse)

0.48

0.18

0.23–0.99

.05

  Gender (female)

1.68

0.54

0.89–3.17

.11

Variable

Coefficient

SE

t

P value

Model 2: Positive attitude of HCWs towards the utility of CDC guidelines

F (6,293) = 7.23; P = < .0001; R2 = 0.13%; adjusted R2 = 0.11%

  Knowledge of correct use of antibiotic ointments at the insertion site of CVC

0.90

0.24

3.82

< .001

  Knowledge about CDC main recommendations for preventing CVC-related infections

0.71

0.26

2.70

.007

  Need of additional information about the prevention of CVC-related infections

0.62

0.27

2.29

.02

  Professional role (physicians)

0.44

0.22

2.03

.04

  Availability of internal protocols about CVC management

0.33

0.21

1.57

.12

  Age

0.01

0.01

1.21

.23

Variable

OR

SE

95% CI

P value

Model 3: HCWs’ adherence about recommended evidence-based practices for preventing CLASBIs

 Log likelihood = −  164.05; χ2 = 10.02 (3 df); p = .02

  Professional role (physicians)

1.91

0.53

1.10–3.30

.02

  Need of additional information about the prevention of CVC-related infections

2.10

0.84

0.96–4.61

.06

  Availability of internal protocols about CVC management

1.44

0.39

0.85–2.44

.18

Variable

OR

SE

95% CI

P value

Model 4: HCWs with positive attitude towards not removing catheter if patient has fever and perform firstly the insertion site dressing removal to allow thorough examination of the site

 Log likelihood = −  154.77; χ2 = 21.61 (5 df); p = .0006

  Knowledge of correct use of antibiotic ointments at the insertion site of CVC

2.77

1.10

1.28–6.01

.01

  Higher number of years of practice

1.03

0.02

1.00–1.06

.04

  Knowledge of correct catheter site dressing regime replacement

1.92

0.62

1.01–3.63

.05

  Higher educational level (college degree or higher)

1.79

0.52

1.01–3.18

.05

  Availability of internal protocols about CVCs management

1.48

0.02

0.85–2.57

.17

Variable

OR

SE

95% CI

P value

Model 5: Correct behaviour regarding the removal of catheter dressing if patients have tenderness at palpation and the performing of a thorough examination of the site

 Log likelihood = −  294.28; χ2 = 25.27 (4 df); p < .0001

  Age

1.03

0.01

1.01–1.06

.02

  Knowledge about CDC main recommendations for preventing CVC-related infections

2.23

0.77

1.13–4.40

.02

  Perception of high utility of guidelines

1.79

0.51

1.03–3.12

.04

  Professional role (physicians)

1.72

0.49

0.98–3.02

.06

  1. HCWs, healthcare workers; CVC, central vascular catheter; CDC, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error; df, degrees of freedom