Skip to main content

Table 3 Network estimates of treatment success with 95% confidence intervals and GRADE assessments

From: Comparative effectiveness of anti-viral drugs with dual activity for treating hepatitis B and HIV co-infected patients: a network meta-analysis

Treatment comparison

Direct estimate; OR (95% CI)

quality of evidence

Indirect estimate; OR (95% CI)

quality of evidence

Network estimate; OR (95% CI)

quality of evidence

ADV FTC

Not available

Not available

0.02 (0.00–3.01)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

0.02 (0.00–3.01)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

ADV vs LMV

Not available

Not available

0.07 (0.00–3.36)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

0.07 (0.00–3.36)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

ADV vs TD

Not available

Not available

0.31 (0.02–6.28)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

0.31 (0.02–6.28)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯S

ADV vs TDF plus LMV

Not available

Not available

0.18 (0.00–9.2)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

0.18 (0.00–9.2)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

ADV vs placebo

Not available

Not available

0.05 (0.00–4.71)

Very low⊕◯◯◯

0.05 (0.00–4.71)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

FTC vs LMV

Not available

Not available

3.01 (0.03–287.25)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

3.01 (0.03–287.25)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

FTC vs TDF plus LMV

Not available

Not available

7.82 (0.08–778.9)

Very low

7.82 (0.08–778.9)

Very low

FTC vs placebo

Not available

Not available

2.23 (0.01–370.4)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

2.23 (0.01–370.4)

Very low ⊕◯◯◯

  1. ADV Adefovir, FTC Emtricitabine, LMV Lamivudine, TDF Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, TDF plus LMV Combined Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and Lamivudine. Rated down one level for incoherence