Skip to main content

Table 3 Number of different patterns and unique strains, clustering percentage, clustering rate and HGDI for the different typing methods in this study

From: Role of MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping in assessing the genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Henan Province, China

Genotyping method Number of pattern Number of cluster Number of clustered isolates Number of isolates with unique profile cluster rate (%) HGDI
spoligotyping 35 10 643 25 0.948 0.325
12-loci miru-vntr 263 51 456 212 0.606 0.925
12loci + sp 292 53 429 239 0.563 0.941
15-loci miru-vntr 501 56 223 445 0.250 0.996
15loci + sp 516 54 206 462 0.228 0.997
24-loci miru-vntr 550 42 160 508 0.177 0.998
24loci + sp 561 40 147 521 0.160 0.998
26-loci miru-vntr 567 38 139 529 0.151 0.998
26loci + sp 576 37 129 539 0.138 0.999