Skip to main content

Table 3 Number of different patterns and unique strains, clustering percentage, clustering rate and HGDI for the different typing methods in this study

From: Role of MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping in assessing the genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Henan Province, China

Genotyping method

Number of pattern

Number of cluster

Number of clustered isolates

Number of isolates with unique profile

cluster rate (%)

HGDI

spoligotyping

35

10

643

25

0.948

0.325

12-loci miru-vntr

263

51

456

212

0.606

0.925

12loci + sp

292

53

429

239

0.563

0.941

15-loci miru-vntr

501

56

223

445

0.250

0.996

15loci + sp

516

54

206

462

0.228

0.997

24-loci miru-vntr

550

42

160

508

0.177

0.998

24loci + sp

561

40

147

521

0.160

0.998

26-loci miru-vntr

567

38

139

529

0.151

0.998

26loci + sp

576

37

129

539

0.138

0.999