Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Not again! Effect of previous test results, age group and reason for testing on (re-)infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in Germany

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol El-Hayek
9 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Woodhall
28 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Alexandra Sarah Lang
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol El-Hayek
27 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alexandra Sarah Lang
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol El-Hayek
4 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alexandra Sarah Lang
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alexandra Sarah Lang
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alexandra Sarah Lang
Resubmission - Version 6
25 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alexandra Sarah Lang
Resubmission - Version 7
28 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
10 Aug 2018 Editorially accepted
25 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12879-018-3323-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement