Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alex Cook|
|25 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katie Anderson|
|27 Mar 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Kristin Baltrusaitis|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Mar 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alex Cook|
|27 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katie Anderson|
|4 Aug 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Kristin Baltrusaitis|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Aug 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Aug 2018||Editorially accepted|
|15 Aug 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12879-018-3322-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.