Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of crowd-sourced, electronic health records based, and traditional health-care based influenza-tracking systems at multiple spatial resolutions in the United States of America

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Cook
25 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katie Anderson
27 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Baltrusaitis
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alex Cook
27 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katie Anderson
4 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Baltrusaitis
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Aug 2018 Editorially accepted
15 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12879-018-3322-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement