Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Treatment outcomes and factors affecting unsuccessful outcome among new pulmonary smear positive and negative tuberculosis patients in Anqing, China: a retrospective study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pedro Suarez
29 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Kuaban
25 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michele Dramaix-Wilmet
25 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yufeng Wen
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michele Dramaix-Wilmet
30 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yufeng Wen
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michele Dramaix-Wilmet
25 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Yufeng Wen
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
5 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12879-018-3019-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement