This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Dengue score as a diagnostic predictor for pleural effusion and/or ascites: external validation and clinical application
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 21 March 2017
Accepted: 15 February 2018
Published: 23 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Siripen Kalayanarooj|
|23 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katie Anderson|
|4 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - suhendro suwarto|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Siripen Kalayanarooj|
|24 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katie Anderson|
|21 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - suhendro suwarto|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Feb 2018||Editorially accepted|
|23 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12879-018-2996-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.