This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Poor quality data challenges conclusion and decision making: timely analysis of measles confirmed and suspected cases line list in Southern Nations Nationalities and People’s Region, Ethiopia
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 28 June 2017
Accepted: 30 January 2018
Published: 12 February 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Misganu Endriyas|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nuria Torner|
|15 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Misganu Endriyas|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|12 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12879-018-2983-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.