Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Poor quality data challenges conclusion and decision making: timely analysis of measles confirmed and suspected cases line list in Southern Nations Nationalities and People’s Region, Ethiopia

  • Misganu Endriyas1Email author,
  • Tarekegn Solomon2,
  • Bekele Belayhun3 and
  • Emebet Mekonnen1
BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:77

Received: 28 June 2017

Accepted: 30 January 2018

Published: 12 February 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
28 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Misganu Endriyas
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nuria Torner
15 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Misganu Endriyas
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
12 Feb 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12879-018-2983-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Health research and technology transfer support process, Southern nations nationalities and people’s regional health bureau, Hawassa, Ethiopia
College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public and Environmental Health, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
Ethiopian Public Health Association, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia