Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of the efficacy of nafcillin and glycopeptides as definitive therapy for patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohammed Abdelgadir Abdelmahmoud
16 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashok Srinivasan
16 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Dong Hyun Oh
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashok Srinivasan
31 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohammed Abdelgadir Abdelmahmoud
4 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Dong Hyun Oh
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Dong Hyun Oh
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Dong Hyun Oh
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
30 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12879-018-2978-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement