Using eHealth to engage and retain priority populations in the HIV treatment and care cascade in the Asia-Pacific region: a systematic review of literature
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John De Wit|
|25 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Udi Davidovich|
|27 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adam Bourne|
|28 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Julianita Purnomo|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John De Wit|
|5 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Julianita Purnomo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|17 Feb 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12879-018-2972-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.