This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Cost-effectiveness of increasing vaccination in high-risk adults aged 18–64 Years: a model-based decision analysis
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 10 March 2017
Accepted: 17 January 2018
Published: 25 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kimberly Shea|
|18 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Litjen (L.J) Tan|
|6 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Angela R Wateska|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jan 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Angela R Wateska|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Jan 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12879-018-2967-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.