This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A 2-year follow-up study of patients with pharyngotonsillitis
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 27 June 2017
Accepted: 13 December 2017
Published: 2 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Habip Gedik|
|8 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tahir Hussain|
|13 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Veranja Liyanapathirana|
|16 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rumina Hasan|
|28 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jon Pallon|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jon Pallon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2917-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.