This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Meta-analysis of the safety of voriconazole in definitive, empirical, and prophylactic therapies for invasive fungal infections
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 2 July 2017
Accepted: 13 December 2017
Published: 28 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 Jul 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Marks|
|5 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Pontarolo|
|6 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jun Lu|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Pontarolo|
|27 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jun Lu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2913-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.