This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of line probe assay to BACTEC MGIT 960 system for susceptibility testing of first and second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs in a referral laboratory in South Africa
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 February 2017
Accepted: 10 December 2017
Published: 28 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maxine Caws|
|28 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Zenteno Cuevas|
|13 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Daley|
|29 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nontuthuko Maningi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Daley|
|25 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberto Zenteno Cuevas|
|7 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nontuthuko Maningi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2898-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.