This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The antibiotic checklist: an observational study of the discrepancy between reported and actually performed checklist items
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 8 August 2017
Accepted: 3 December 2017
Published: 8 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rogelio de J. Treviño-Rangel|
|30 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Haines|
|26 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Frederike van Daalen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Frederike van Daalen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2878-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.