Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The antibiotic checklist: an observational study of the discrepancy between reported and actually performed checklist items

  • Frederike V. van Daalen1Email author,
  • Marlies E. J. L. Hulscher2,
  • Cas Minderhoud1,
  • Jan M. Prins1 and
  • Suzanne E. Geerlings1
BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:16

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2878-7

Received: 8 August 2017

Accepted: 3 December 2017

Published: 8 January 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rogelio de J. Treviño-Rangel
30 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Haines
26 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Frederike van Daalen
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Frederike van Daalen
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
3 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2878-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
(2)
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Advertisement