Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Nevirapine- versus Efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV and Tuberculosis infections in India: a multi-centre study

  • Sanjeev Sinha1Email author,
  • Kartik Gupta1,
  • Srikanth Tripathy2,
  • Sahajal Dhooria1,
  • Sanjay Ranjan1 and
  • R. M. Pandey3
BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:761

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2864-0

Received: 28 June 2017

Accepted: 27 November 2017

Published: 11 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pasquale De Nardo
14 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - SANJEEV SINHA
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - SANJEEV SINHA
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
27 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2864-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departments of Medicine, All-India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
(2)
National AIDS Research Institute (NARI), Pune, India
(3)
Biostatistics, All-India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Advertisement