This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Impact of inappropriate antifungal therapy according to current susceptibility breakpoints on Candida bloodstream infection mortality, a retrospective analysis
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 5 September 2017
Accepted: 21 November 2017
Published: 6 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Sep 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Geddes-McAlister|
|20 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fernando Riera|
|7 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Gonzalez-Lara|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Gonzalez-Lara|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2846-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.