Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparison of the test-negative and the traditional case-control study designs for estimation of influenza vaccine effectiveness under nonrandom vaccination

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
29 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eelko Hak
23 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Petrie
30 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Meng Shi
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joshua Petrie
21 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eelko Hak
9 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Meng Shi
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
16 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2838-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement