This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Prevention of tick bites: an evaluation of a smartphone app
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 21 August 2016
Accepted: 16 November 2017
Published: 4 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melanie Fisher|
|3 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kevin Griffith|
|30 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Antonise-Kamp|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kevin Griffith|
|1 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Antonise-Kamp|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2836-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.