Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Using risk-tracing snowball approach to increase HIV case detection among high-risk populations in Cambodia: an intervention study

BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:689

Received: 22 May 2017

Accepted: 4 October 2017

Published: 18 October 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
22 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - NIPAM SHAH
26 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Burnett
3 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Srean Chhim
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - NIPAM SHAH
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
18 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2790-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

FHI 360, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Asia Pacific Regional Office, FHI 360, Bangkok, Thailand
Chhouk Sar Association, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
KHANA Center for Population Health Research, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Center for Global Health Research, Touro University California, Vallejo, USA
Boeung Keng Kang III, Phnom Penh, Cambodia