This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Multiplex PCR point of care testing versus routine, laboratory-based testing in the treatment of adults with respiratory tract infections: a quasi-randomised study assessing impact on length of stay and antimicrobial use
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 March 2017
Accepted: 3 October 2017
Published: 10 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tristan William Clark|
|31 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roel Nijhuis|
|21 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Denise Andrews|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roel Nijhuis|
|29 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Denise Andrews|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|10 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2784-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.