Skip to main content

Table 3 Study Characteristics of rapid-diagnostic tests (RDTs) or laboratory-based immunoassays (EIA) against nucleic-acid test reference standards [RDT/EIA vs NAT]

From: Diagnostic accuracy of tests to detect hepatitis B surface antigen: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Study [author, year]

Location [country, city]

Sample size, n

Study design

Setting

Sample

Test under evaluation [type, brand]

Reference test [type, brand]

Ansari, 2007 [51]

Iran, Urumieh

240

CC

Hospital patients

S

RDT, ACON

RDT, Atlas

RDT, Blue Cross

RDT, Cortez

RDT, DIMA

RDT, Intec

qPCR

Nna, 2014 [52]

Nigeria

113

CS

Blood donors (repeat) – all were HIV negative

P

RDT, ACON

Nested PCR; qPCR for positive

Seremba, 2010 [53]

Uganda

157

CS - CSQ

Hospital patients (emergency medical ward), including HIV+ (83) and HIV- (74).

S

RDT, Cortez

EIA, ADVIA

PCR

Khadem-Ansari, 2014 [54]

Iran, Urumieh

350

CS – CSQ?

Hospital patients - referred as? HBV

S

ChLIA, Liaison

Rt-PCR

Lukhwareni, 2009 [56]

South Africa

192

CC

HIV cohort - pre ART

S

ChLIA, Elecsys

qPCR

Mphahlele, 2006 [57]

South Africa

295

CC

Hospital patients, HIV+ (167) and HIV- (128)

S

EIA, AxSYM

Nested PCR

Olinger, 2007 [55]

Nigeria, Ibadan

200

CS

Hospital patients - Liver disease, HIV

S

MEIA, AxSYM v2

ChLIA, Elecsys

ELFA, VIDAS Ultra

rtPCR and nested PCR

  1. CC case control, ChLIA chemiluminescent immunoassay, CMIA chemiluminescent microparticle enzyme immunoassay, CS cross-sectional, CSQ consecutive patients, ECLIA electrochemiluminescent immunoassay, EIA enzyme immunoassay, ELFA enzyme linked fluorescent assay, ELISA enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, MEIA microparticle enzyme immunoassay, qPCR quantitative PCR, RDT rapid diagnostic test, rtPCR realtime PCR