This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Acute undifferentiated fever in India: a multicentre study of aetiology and diagnostic accuracy
- Kristine Mørch1, 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Anand Manoharan3,
- Sara Chandy3,
- Novin Chacko4,
- Gerardo Alvarez-Uria5,
- Suvarna Patil6,
- Anil Henry7,
- Joel Nesaraj8,
- Cijoy Kuriakose9,
- Ashita Singh10,
- Siby Kurian3,
- Christel Gill Haanshuus1,
- Nina Langeland1, 2,
- Bjørn Blomberg1, 2,
- George Vasanthan Antony3 and
- Dilip Mathai3
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 4 May 2017
Accepted: 25 September 2017
Published: 4 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Harriet Mayanja-Kizza|
|8 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Archana Sud|
|15 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pandey Kishor|
|10 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kristine Mørch|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Archana Sud|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2764-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.