Skip to main content

Table 5 Percentage antimicrobial resistance profile of Gram-positive bacterial isolate (n = 81)

From: Species distribution and antibiotic susceptibility profile of bacterial uropathogens among patients complaining urinary tract infections

Species

Antibacterial drugs

CIP

CM

E

GM

LEV

MNO

MXF

FT

QDA

RA

TE

TGC

SXT

LIN

VA

DAP

E. faecalis (14)

7.1

7.1

85.8

0

0

85.8

0

0

100

0

78.6

7.1

7.1

7.1

0

0

S. aureus (9)

33.3

66.7

66.7

22.2

22.2

11.1

0

0

22.2

33.3

66.7

33.3

55.6

0

0

0

S. epidermidis (8)

62.5

100

75

0

62.5

12.5

0

0

50

50

62.5

25

25

37.5

0

–

S.saprophyticus (18)

27.8

88.9

94.4

16.7

38.9

0

38.9

5.6

38.9

50

72.2

0

55.6

5.6

0

5.6

S. agalactiae (8)

0

100

–

–

0

–

–

–

0

–

100

25

–

0

0

–

S. haemolyticus (2)

0

50

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

50

0

0

0

–

0

0

S. lentus (3)

100

33.3

66.7

0

66.7

66.7

33.3

0

66.7

33.3

100

0

100

0

0

0

S. hominis (6)

66.7

100

100

0

66.7

50

0

0

66.7

66.7

83.3

0

50

0

0

0

S. warneri (9)

44.4

66.7

77.8

0

22.2

22.2

11.1

11.1

11.1

44.4

77.8

0

55.6

0

0

–

K. kristinae (2)

100

50

100

0

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

S. porcinus (1)

0

–

100

 

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

E. gallinarum (1)

100

–

100

–

100

100

–

0

–

–

100

–

–

100

0

–

All isolates

34.6

68.4

82.2

7.0

29.5

31.4

13.1

2.9

44.2

37.7

75.6

10.4

42

7.9

0

1.9

  1. CIP ciprofloxacin, CM clindamycin, E erythromycin, GM gentamicin, LEV levofloxacin, MN0 minocycline, MXF moxifloxacin, FT nitrofurantoin, QDA ouinupristin/dalfopristin, RA rifampicin, TE tetracycline, TGC tigecycline, LIN linezolid, SXT trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, VA vancomycin, DAP daptomycin, S sensitive, R resistance
  2. P = Pattern
  3. MIC of K. kristinae, S. porcinus and S. agalactiae was carried out by disc diffusion assay method
  4. - = Not tested