This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Lessons from a decade of individual-based models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2006-2015)
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 25 November 2016
Accepted: 22 August 2017
Published: 11 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sebastian Funk|
|9 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luc Coffeng|
|21 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Claire Harris|
|21 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Lander Willem|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Claire Harris|
|17 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Lander Willem|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2699-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.