Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Improving ART programme retention and viral suppression are key to maximising impact of treatment as prevention – a modelling study

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6,
  • 4,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:557

Received: 25 April 2017

Accepted: 1 August 2017

Published: 9 August 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
25 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
26 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Varduhi Ghazaryan
14 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alessia Mammone
23 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Graham
24 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nicky McCreesh
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2664-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
MRC/UVRI Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda
School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, Lower Mountjoy, Durham, UK
College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK