This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Evaluation of vaccination herd immunity effects for anogenital warts in a low coverage setting with human papillomavirus vaccine—an interrupted time series analysis from 2005 to 2010 using health insurance data
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 21 October 2016
Accepted: 1 August 2017
Published: 14 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Junko Tanaka|
|28 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Perkins|
|18 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kathrin Thöne|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Perkins|
|7 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laila Khawar|
|18 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kathrin Thöne|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|14 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2663-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.