This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Population effectiveness of the pentavalent and monovalent rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 4 July 2016
Accepted: 18 July 2017
Published: 15 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sylvia Becker-Dreps|
|7 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mustafa Hacimustafaoglu|
|6 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Hungerford|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Harder|
|14 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Hungerford|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Harder|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|15 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2613-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.