Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cost-effectiveness analysis of different types of human papillomavirus vaccination combined with a cervical cancer screening program in mainland China

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kine Pedersen
10 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samik Datta
8 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiuting Mo
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiuting Mo
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samik Datta
29 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kine Pedersen
8 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiuting Mo
Resubmission - Version 4
8 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kine Pedersen
24 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiuting Mo
Resubmission - Version 5
24 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiuting Mo
Resubmission - Version 6
31 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
18 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kine Pedersen
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
4 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
18 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2592-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement