Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of model parameters

From: Pharmacoeconomic analysis of antifungal therapy for primary treatment of invasive candidiasis caused by Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species

Variable

Value [ref.]

Probability of success rate (%)

 

All species

 Fluconazole

63 [22]

 Anidulafungin

77.49 [22]

 Micafungin

75.98 [22]

 Caspofungin

76.10 [22]

C. albicans specific

 

 Echinocandins

81 [8]

 Non-echinocandins

22a [7]

 Non-albicans specific

 Echinocandins

71 [8]

 Non-echinocandins

71a [7]

Probability of mortality (%)

All species

 Fluconazole

28.44 [22]

 Anidulafungin

20.75 [22]

 Micafungin

39.16 [22]

 Caspofungin

33.83 [22]

C. albicans specific

 

 Echinocandins

19 [Pfizer, Data in file]

 Non-echinocandins

35a [7]

 Non-albicans specific

 

 Echinocandins

26 [Pfizer, Data in file]

 Non-echinocandins

50a [7]

 Percentage that die during therapy (%)

23.26 [25]

 Life expectancy, mean (years)

9.12 [9]

 Length of IV treatment for patients with treatment success and then survival (days)

14 [6, 18]

Major drug adverse events

 Nephrotoxicity probability for amphotericin B (%)

33.7 [26]

 Relative risk of nephrotoxicity of fluconazole compared with that of amphotericin B

0.22 (95% CI, 0.15–0.32) [22]

 Relative risk of nephrotoxicity of echinocandins compared with that of amphotericin B

0.31 (95% CI, 0.17–0.57) [22]

 Additional LOS for nephrotoxicity, mean (days)

7 (95% CI, 5.7–8.4) [27]

 Time required to determine clinical failure (days)

5 [Expert opinion]

 Follow up period (weeks)

6 [Expert opinion]

 Time to death for patients who had treatment success but died before 6-week follow-up, mean (weeks)

3.25 [8]

 Time to death for patients who had treatment failure that died before 6-week follow-up, mean (weeks)

3.25 [8]

 Average time to death during therapy (weeks)

1 [Expert opinion]

ICU LOS (days)b

 Success and then survival

7 [Expert opinion]

 Success and then death

7 [Expert opinion]

 Failure and then survival

14 [Expert opinion]

 Failure and then death

14 [Expert opinion]

Other hospital LOS (days)b

 Success and then survival

23 [Expert opinion]

 Success and then death

23 [Expert opinion]

 Failure and death survival

23 [Expert opinion]

 Failure and then death

23 [Expert opinion]

Cost (US$)

 Loading dose cost

 

 Fluconazole 400 mg/day

43.76 [28]

 Anidulafungin 200 mg/day

164.48 [28]

 Micafungin 100 mg/day

108.85 [28]

 Caspofungin 70 mg/day

517.70 [28]

 Liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg for a patient with 76.4 kg ± 25.5 kg

962.61 [28]

 Echinocandins

263.67c [28]

 Non-echinocandins

43.76d [28]

Maintenance dose cost

 

 Fluconazole 400 mg/day

43.76 [28]

 Anidulafungin 100 mg/day

82.24 [28]

 Micafungin 100 mg/day

108.85 [28]

 Caspofungin 50 mg/day

258.85 [28]

 Liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg for a patient with 76.4 kg (± 25.5 kg)

962.61 [28]

 Echinocandins

149.97c [28]

 Non-echinocandins

43.76d [28]

 ICU cost per day

203.39 [28]

 Other hospital cost per day

43.27 [28]

  1. Abbreviations: LOS length of hospital stay, ICU intensive care unit
  2. aTransformation of data from literature [7, 8]. Of note, because there appears to be no significant difference in the treatment success rate among the three echinocandins, we used the data (i.e., treatment success) for anidulafungin for C. albicans and non-albicans, respectively, in Reboli et al.’s study [8] for “echinocandins” for C. albicans and non-albicans. For example, Reboli et al.’s study [8] reported a success rate of anidulafungin treatment for C. albicans of 0.81 and Adnes et al.’s study [7] showed that the odds ratio for echinocandin treatment success as compared to that for non-echinocandins (including polyenes [amphotericin B and liposomal amphotericin B] and triazoles [fluconazole and voriconazole]) for C. albicans is 3.7, so the success rate of non-echinocandins was estimated to be 0.22. Similarly, Reboli et al.’s study [8] reported a success rate of anidulafungin treatment for non-albicans (including C. glabrate, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and other species) of 0.71 and Adnes et al.’s study [7] showed that the odds ratio for echinocandins treatment success as compared to that of non-echinocandins for non-albicans is 1, so the success rate of non-echinocandins for non-albicans was estimated to be 0.71. This transformation was also applied to estimate mortality rates for echinocandins and non-echinocandins for C. albicans and non-albicans, respectively
  3. bAccording to clinical practice in Taiwan [16, 17], experts assumed an average of 30 days for total length of hospital stay (LOS), of which 7 days are for stay in intensive care unit (ICU) and 23 days are for other hospital stay
  4. cAverage drug cost of echinocandins, including anidulafungin, micafungin, and caspofungin
  5. dThe cost of non-echinocandins refers to drug cost of fluconazole