Clinical failure with and without empiric atypical bacteria coverage in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 27 February 2017
Accepted: 25 May 2017
Published: 2 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rukmini Bhardwaj|
|9 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amrendra Gupta|
|2 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - khalid eljaaly|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amrendra Gupta|
|11 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rukmini Bhardwaj|
|24 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - khalid eljaaly|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2495-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.