This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Clonal replacement of epidemic KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a hospital in China
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 19 October 2016
Accepted: 16 May 2017
Published: 23 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kazuki Harada|
|20 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana María Ocampo|
|18 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Yuying Liang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kazuki Harada|
|9 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana María Ocampo|
|22 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yuying Liang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kazuki Harada|
|16 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Megha Thakkar|
|21 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yuying Liang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|23 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2467-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.