This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessing real-time Zika risk in the United States
- Lauren A. Castro†1,
- Spencer J. Fox†1Email author,
- Xi Chen2,
- Kai Liu3,
- Steven E. Bellan4, 5,
- Nedialko B. Dimitrov2,
- Alison P. Galvani6, 7 and
- Lauren Ancel Meyers1, 8
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 1 February 2017
Accepted: 11 April 2017
Published: 4 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Walker|
|2 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Qian Zhang|
|22 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Lauren Castro|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2394-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.